![]() ![]() I'm sure you know all the modifications and assignments that need to be made with any change, overwhelming. ![]() Not to mention, point density is a nightmare, imagine a 12 mile 4 lane divided highway with certain breaklines having a point spacing of 0.1m, yea, huge file sizes. This results in several additions and revisions throughout the project, including Hal, Val, pavement width alignments, super elevation, side slopes, ditches, etc well pretty much everything. Recent projects I have been working on are very poorly designed and/or not completely designed. This method gives better point/breakline/code carateristics as compared to the SG manager, but then you have to merge surfaces or clip and relayer the individual surfaces. I too have been doing the same procedure of droping the Val and creating a new roadjob from time to time myself, pending my project situation. That was way before quantity calculations became just as much, if not more important, than creating a surface for machine control and survey stakeout. Man I miss the good old days of just creating the FG surface. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |